Investment Outlook 2008
Economic growth:
Despite expectations of recession, US economic growth remains fairly robust. Retail sales and personal consumption growth has slowed but remains in positive territory. Consumption is no longer viably financed by credit, and has to be financed by wealth creation or income. Asset values are falling. Personal income growth has slowed but remains in positive territory. The savings rate, however, has fallen to dangerous low levels. Growth in consumer credit is likely to slow as banks tighten lending standards. The connection between house prices and consumption is contentious. With credit availability being reduced for at least 2 quarters now, the impact would have been felt in retail sales. That it hasn’t may be due to the tax relief in the first quarter of this year. Unemployment has been rising for a year and is expected to rise further. Consumption is fragile.
Conference board business confidence and expectations indicators have been depressed. Given that consumer confidence is similarly depressed, the outlook for consumption is poor, consumer credit is likely to contract and asset values are declining, business confidence is likely to fall further. However, they are near historical lows marked in the late 1970’s, early 1990’s and 2000 recessions and are likely to bottom out when GDP growth confirms recessionary conditions. Until then it is unlikely that firms will undertake to increase investment. Investment is also driven by ROI hurdles defined by prevailing and expected interest rates as well as risk premia. With credit markets in decline, credit spreads widening and bank lending in decline, investment will need to be funded by cash flow and ultimately profits. Corporate profitability is likely to be squeezed from the inability to pass on imported inflation to consumers. Corporate revenues will face headwinds from weaker consumption growth. The overall outlook for investment is poor.
The external sector may provide some relief to output. A weak USD is supportive of trade and could reverse the balance of trade deficit. The trade balance with Japan is unlikely to adjust given economic growth in Japan. Europe is an important trade partner as well by size, however, weak economic growth in Europe will limit the potential improvement of the trade balance with that region. The likely areas for improvement will be with China, Pacific Rim, LatAm and OPEC. The US export sectors are concentrated in capital goods and industrial supplies. Consumer, autos, technology are unlikely to contribute much in any reversal. The infrastructure investment of Asia and OPEC is likely to play to the strengths of the capital goods and industrial supplies heavy exports of the US. The outlook for trade is favorable.
Overall, it appears that the US is headed for a protracted slowdown with weakness in consumption and investment. The government is not in a position to operate an expansionary fiscal policy in the face of rising inflation and a significant budget deficit. The external sector will likely provide some relief.
If inflation recedes as we expect it will this may allow the Fed to lower interest rates or at least keep them on hold.
In Europe, the picture is similar. Economic growth is expected to slow. Unemployment may take a longer time to adjust, upwards. Retail sales have fallen sharply across the Euro zone.
GDP growth in China remains robust although it has now slowed over the last 3 quarters (since 4Q 2007). Unemployment remains low. Average earnings remain robust. Inflation has been rising. Retail sales have been remarkably strong. At the same time, consumer sentiment is falling quite quickly. Economy was euphoric in the summer of 2007. Government policy has been hawkish on inflation in the past year. The recent slowdown in growth, albeit from elevated levels, has given policymakers pause. Rhetoric has been indicative of more accommodative policy going forward. Demand for exports, particularly from the US, will come from investment and to a lesser extent from consumption. In the meantime, China continues to diversify its trade from the US and Asia towards Europe and Africa.
India has been experiencing robust and stable economic growth. Inflation has been accelerating, however, and the RBOI has been actively raising rates to reign in inflation. Industrial production peaked in early 2007 and has slowed down substantially.
Inflation
Inflation has been trending up in most countries and is substantially higher than a year ago. On the demand side are the high growth emerging economies such as China, India, Lat Am. On the supply side, bottlenecks in the infrastructure in emerging economies are responsible for increased volatility.
In the US, PPI is rising at 14.5% per annum, a rate not seen since 1979, 1974 and 1951. Import prices are rising at 20.5% against export prices which are rising at 8.5%. CPI has been rising as well, albeit less rapidly, rising 5% year on year to June 2008. Core inflation is rising at a less robust 2.4%. The main source of inflation is from food and energy and from imported inflation. Energy prices are volatile and will likely recede quickly if economic growth slows globally. Food price inflation is driven by two forces, one is the competition for inputs from energy and the other is a emerging market populations such as China and India substituting to less calorie efficient diets (grains to meat). The latter will be a more persistent source of inflation. Inflation from poor infrastructure, the result of underinvestment in past years will also be more protracted. Given the composition of CPI in the US, while energy and food price inflation is a problem, we do not see it as a debilitating one.
Capacity utilization peaked in 2005 around the low 80’s and currently has broken below 80. There exists domestic capacity to relieve some of the inflationary pressures from a weak USD and rising external inflation. This may provide some economic justification for the otherwise misguided protectionist tendencies arising in the US. The economic impact of any protectionist policies may therefore not have as dire an impact as might be expected otherwise.
Note that with the US economy slowing, US bank bailouts are highly inflationary and the implementation of any bailout needs to be specific and temporary.
Unit labor costs, personal income and employment costs have not seen significant strength in the past 8 years. Wage inflation has not been in evidence although this is clearly an area of concern going forward. Wages have lagged profits and may have to adjust. If so, this may drive inflation.
The analysis of the US can be loosely extrapolated to the developed world.
Where inflation will be a serious problem will be in poorer countries where food and energy are a significant proportion of CPI. In the past 12 months the largest increases in inflation have been in
The rise in inflation has indeed been broadly negatively correlated with per capital GDP. LatAm, Eastern Europe and MENA have seen substantial inflationary pressures. Even agri economies have not been spared as open economies import inflation.
2007 has seen robust growth in infrastructure spend particularly in emerging markets. Inflation pressures will limit the extent to which these economies will be able to operate fiscally reflationary policies. This will put to test the theory that emerging markets domestic demand is rising as a driver of economic growth.
Policy
US: As the US is the world’s largest financial economy, the Fed is hostage to it. If as we expect, inflation turns out not to be as persistent a problem, the Fed will not have to aggressively raise interest rates. It is likely that it will delay any decision in the hope of receiving more encouraging news on the inflation front. One thing to note is that bank rescues are inflationary in nature and may require some balancing by the Fed. On balance we expect the Fed to hold steady. That does not mean that the current Fed Funds rate is signaling the appropriate market clearing interest rate. US interest rates are probably too low for normal conditions and are probably more appropriate to addressing flagging domestic demand. In any case the source of inflation is not domestic and it is unlikely that higher interest rates will dampen price pressures.
UK: The UK is broadly in the same position in the US in terms of interest rate policy. Inflationary pressures from economic bottlenecks are probably higher than in the US thus calling for a more hawkish stance. The BoE is similarly caught between slowing economic growth which is at risk of deteriorating further, and risks that inflation accelerates. Unlike the US, a good proportion of inflation is domestically generated and can therefore be addressed with higher rates. On In addition the BoE has explicit inflation targets. We therefore expect the BoE to raise rates rather than keep them on hold.
Europe: Euro area inflation has been rising substantially. Unlike the Fed and the BoE, the ECB has actually acted to raise interest rates by 25 basis points to 4.25% on 3 July 2008. Inflation has been particularly strong in Spain, Greece and Ireland. The ECB has been quite clear as to its intentions on the inflation fighting front and we can expect rates to rise further if inflation continues to rise. We expect, however, that inflation numbers will moderate and the need for further rate increases will abate.
China: Inflation is running at 7.1% YOY June 2008. Surprisingly the pattern of inflation across urban and rural areas is fairly balanced. As expected the price pressures were concentrated in construction costs, food and energy. Consumer non durables and services saw little if any inflation. It appears that China is a classic case of cyclicality in growth and prices with the expected lags. The PBOC is actively addressing inflation while trying to maintain stable growth. China is in the middle of a major infrastructure build out which in itself is highly inflationary. The PBOC will have to act to counteract the impact of this government expenditure. In a lower per capita GDP economy, marginal propensities to consume tend to be larger as consumer staples account for a larger proportion of expenditure. The PBOC has so far acted to restrict bank credit to minimize any multiplier effects from the financial system. It is not clear if the PBOC will try to impact multiplier effects on the consumption side. Increasing specific consumption taxes will go some way to mitigate these impacts.
India: The RBI is already hawkish as inflation is rising quite quickly. Currency volatility has been a concern recently as the INR weakened significantly this year. India is desperately in need of improved infrastructure but a substantial budget deficit is straining the government’s ability to fund it. At the same time, any infrastructure spend would be highly inflationary. There is overinvestment in the real estate sector and risk of a severe reversal.
Equity
US:
Corporate earnings have come in weak, as expected. Exporters are showing some signs of strength on a weak USD. Valuations are still elevated by historical standards. In the oil shock stagflation of the early 1970’s valuations fell from the 20’s to single digits. The current average PE of the S&P500 is still in the high teens. Under an inflationary scenario, this is likely to test the single digits. With earnings downgrades in progress, the outlook for US equities is quite unfavorable.
Europe:
Corporate earnings in Europe will similarly come under pressure. A strong EUR will further disadvantage Euro Zone companies. Valuations, however, have priced in inflationary conditions as well as weaker earnings. The Estoxx trades at an average PE of 10X, as does the FTSE. Expectations are for zero growth over 2009. The Swiss market, however, trades out of line in the high 20’s. Currently the European markets represent relatively good value.
Greater China, Asia:
The slowdown in the US and Europe will inevitably impact the earnings of China companies. Domestic inflation fighting policy will also dampen economic growth. The market is still expecting earnings growth of mid teens to mid twenties for China companies in the current year and similar growth rates in the following year. Valuations are in the mid to high twenties in China and low teens in Hong Kong. Greater China companies were acutely overvalued at their heights in mid 2007 but have retraced by between 40 – 50 % since then.
Japan:
The Nikkei 225 and Topix PEs are circa 16X. Growth is slowing and the economy is at risk of slipping back into recession. The difference this time is that inflation is actually rising, albeit from a low base.
India:
The market PE is circa 14 with zero growth expected in the current year and mid teen growth expected in the following year.
Corp Debt
Foreigners will be switching out of US treasuries. Some substitution into corporate debt. Valuations crucial and market always overshoots.
If someone is switching out of lending to the US government, unlikely they will want to lend to a US corporate. Ditto UK. Will only switch country. Or asset class.
Sovereign Debt
Japan, China together hold about 1 trillion in US sovereign debt. UK holds 250 billion USD, Oil producers hold 140 billion USD.
For China and Japan, buying US treasuries is the equivalent of a leasing business serving US consumers in aggregate. The BoJ has slowed its purchases of US treasuries and its holding of US treasuries has also decreased. China, however, continues to be a buyer and its holdings are still increasing. Part of this will be due to efforts to control the natural strength of the CNY. As inflation and credit market problems and bailouts debase the USD, foreign central banks and will not be as willing to accept US treasuries to fund US consumption. The US as a nation will likely find the cost of debt rising. Yields on US treasuries should rise. Taken together with our view on the Fed’s inflation and growth stance, the yield curve is likely to continue to steepen.
Foreign investors will not likely want to lend to US consumer. The may like to own US assets but at lower valuations.
Commodities
Industrial Metals – likely to be weaker, range bound in a new range, unlikely to retreat to 2003 levels, steel and infrastructure related resources likely to be supported.
Gold – inflation hedge and risk barometer is likely to weaken as risk becomes fully priced and inflation begins to ease off.
Softs and Ags – energy impacted crops likely to ease off, however, generally strong from changing dietary habits from developing countries.
Energy – highly cyclical and likely to fall from highly overbought territory, do not see a return to 2003 levels but expect significant short term weakness.
FX
FX is highly unpredictable. Notwithstanding, we expect FX to be driven as follows.
USD generally weak, big C/A deficit, inflation, need to be more export competitive,
GBP weak, big C/A deficit, inflation, need to be more export competitive,
EUR, generally weak, need to be more export competitive,
JPY strong, C/A surplus, may weaken as Japan slips into recession,
RMB strong, rising domestic demand, middle class, consumption, acquisition currency,
Asian FX strong in general,
INR weak, C/A deficit, Inflation
Latam FX strong, credit ratings upgrades, agri commodities,
CHF, SGD strong, flight to safety, will weaken as global risk pricing comes off,
MENA FX strong,
AUD, CAD, MYR strong, commodities impact, AU is running a very high C/A deficit and inflation is high, will likely come off as commodities rally peters out.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
The first misconception that most people have is that the Federal Reserve Bank is a branch of the US government. IT IS NOT. THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IS A PRIVATE COMPANY. Most people believe it is as American as the Constitution. THE FACT IS THE CONSTITUTION FORBIDS IT'S EXISTENCE. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution states that Congress shall have the power to create money and regulate the value thereof, NOT A BUNCH OF INTERNATIONAL BANKERS! Today the FED controls and profits by printing WORTHLESS PAPER, called money, through the Treasury, regulating its value, AND THE BIGGEST OUTRAGE OF ALL, COLLECTING INTEREST ON IT! (THE SO-CALLED NATIONAL DEBT). The FED began with approximately 300 people or banks that became owners, stockholders purchasing stock at $100 per share - the stock is not publicly traded) in the Federal Reserve Banking System. They make up an international banking cartel of wealth beyond comparison. The FED banking system collects billions of dollars in interest annually and distributes the profits to its shareholders. The Congress illegally gave the FED the right to print money through the Treasury at no interest to the FED.
The FED creates money from nothing, and loans it back to us through banks, and charges interest on our currency. The FED also buys Government debt with money printed on a printing press and charges U.S. taxpayers interest. Many Congressmen and Presidents say this is fraud. Who actually owns the Federal Reserve Central Banks? The ownership of the 12 Central banks, a very well kept secret, has been revealed: 1. Rothschild Bank of London 2. Warburg Bank of Hamburg 3. Rothschild Bank of Berlin 4. Lehman Brothers of New York 5. Lazard Brothers of Paris 6. Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York 7. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy 8. Goldman, Sachs of New York 9. Warburg Bank of Amsterdam 10. Chase Manhattan Bank of New York.
Post a Comment